Firstly we must define what being 'great' really is. The definition of 'great' is 'of ability, quality or eminence considerably above average'. Looking at this, it can be said that despite being tyrannical and brutal, it is still possible for Alexander to be great. He created new and successful military tactics, showing above average intelligence in order to come up with his ideas and was very famous in his time as well as now. He united the world and brought previous Greek and Persian enemies together, uniting them through new culture and language. He also let places keep their religions and leaders, preventing further battles and bloodshed over such matters. This also kept the peace since the leader kept his power and didn't become a puppet of Alexander which may have led to rebellions. With these places united, they could begin to help and support each other through a large trade system, distributing resources accross the world. His cruelty and brutality was a necessary part of the task he had set out to do and the outcome of peace throughout the world surely outweighs the losses made in the process of uniting Persia and Greece for example. This is also needed to show his military strength and establish himself as a good leader. Furthermore, Alexander also shows much mercy, by letting surrendering towns live on in peace and it is also shown in his kiind treatment of Darius' wife.
Ultimately, although Alexander was cruel and a tyrannt, he still excelled in many matters such as leadership and military tactics, making him fulfill the requirements to be defined as Great.
No comments:
Post a Comment